The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on unlawful sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in presence, but the world-famous stars were conspicuously consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial sites providing both totally free casino-style video games and profitable rewards, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now discovers itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of lots of gaming corporations, not to point out claim complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments act as traditional gambling establishments, only without the oversight, customer protections and tax laws. So not just can they avoid the high 24-percent federal sports betting levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the company deals with accusations of illegal gaming in a New york city claim that claims VGW utilizes celebrity endorsers to 'develop a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm unsure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebs from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any distinctions in between traditional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - games are free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he frequently promotes on social networks

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements usually center around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the potential for actual gaming losses.

Others tempt consumers with pledges of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad flaunting Drake's automobiles, planes and estates before rotating to video of the rap artist playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never offered up.'

The discrepancy in between sports betting websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not involved with the previous.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps consumers never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of customers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the normal deposit or bet size at real-money online sports betting websites.'

Social gambling establishments provide customers a chance to play casino-style video games with good friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency often referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, but can be used to open numerous features within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes video gaming, allowing clients to get other currency called 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones declared by plaintiffs in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement showing off Drake's cars, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all but 7 states, which has actually assisted to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't require typically require recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit customers to send mail-in demands for totally free sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully specific directions. What's more, gamers are often rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, consequently providing a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for a chance to win - or lose - genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes websites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a method of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes games are simply a type of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever have to pay for a chance to win rewards. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an important difference between social sweeps and standard online sports betting websites like gambling establishments.'

Think of the way that McDonald's uses its yearly Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the chance to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself does not meet the meaning of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all sort of everyday services in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are routinely utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of gambling market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run forever. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, thereby suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're generally not connected to casino-style games of opportunity,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the characteristics frequently associated with McDonald's-design sweepstakes promotions,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments provide" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the typical payment portion for a short-lived marketing sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the income made by the company [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the web cafes that sprang up in Florida, providing customers the possibility to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have since been shuttered over claims of illegal gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos ought to face similar analysis.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually consistently been pointed out by courts and state chief law officer as essential elements in determining that a sweepstakes promotion remained in reality a guise for illegal gambling.'

Among the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact brand-new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up substantial tax and revenue opportunities as this gambling replaces that carried out through regulated channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social casinos in more than a dozen states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, stating the settlement was made to prevent legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent suit, which is largely comparable to its predecessors, New york city state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'prohibited gaming enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as defendants in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech company reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for remark.

'We typically don't discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative informed DailyMail.com via email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has actually only just been submitted with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

'We have complete self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and remain confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to use our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of North America, as we have for more than a decade, developing not only great games, user experiences and entertainment, however also ensuring this is done securely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively common throughout the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we mean to intensely safeguard any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The concerns between traditional online gambling and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show bothersome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with conventional gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that professional athletes are hawking illegal sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the same time the leagues desire to predict a strong stance versus illegal gambling - specifically when trying to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over claims he conspired with bettors. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting apparently unlawful gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on athletes backing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also overlooked to respond to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have an obligation to describe to clients the distinctions and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our company practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'A few of our worths are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady prohibited gaming sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at threat as well as courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare damage,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in unlawful gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton